Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bryan Dumont's avatar

Very few, it seems to me, desire the labor of writing—no more than one might desire the labor of cleaning or yard work or being at church at 7am Sunday morning. Some are more or less inclined toward one form of labor or another, and most (I hope) find satisfaction in the successful outcome of their labor. Any yet, there is something unique about a writer’s relationship with their labor. Many words have been devoted to pondering the authors’ love-hate relationship with these words. We all assume it comes so much easier to others and are never assuaged to hear that often it doesn’t (David Brooks writes about this often). If AI revealed anything, it is that there is something much more powerful about language than we ever fully understood. I’m less worried about AI than I am of discovering the postmodernists might have been right— that intelligence, meaning and reality are contingent on language (of all of the theories of AI, it is the LLM that has unleashed it). We also know from our theology the connection between words and creation. It’s not a coincidence that we translate logos into “the word.” Our creation story reveals not the materialist instruction manual our empirical minds insist but rather defines creation itself as the act of naming, categorizing, abstracting. Perhaps the labor of writing may be closer than we think to desire…not only because of the pleasure (ecstasy?) derived from insight, but because there’s something about it we fear. If finding the right words is more than quotidian labor but rather the essence of creation itself, we should enter into it with a healthy dose of fear…?

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?